<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An example of how Verizon&#8217;s Portland FIOS sale could go bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dolavim.us/blog/2009/08/26/an-example-of-how-verizons-portland-fios-sale-could-go-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dolavim.us/blog/2009/08/26/an-example-of-how-verizons-portland-fios-sale-could-go-bad/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-example-of-how-verizons-portland-fios-sale-could-go-bad</link>
	<description>Venimus Vedimus Dolavim.us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 05:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tpepper</title>
		<link>http://dolavim.us/blog/2009/08/26/an-example-of-how-verizons-portland-fios-sale-could-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>tpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dolavim.us/blog/?p=581#comment-218</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to guess Frontier isn&#039;t popping up in Juniper or Cisco or other network vendors&#039; press releases as a proof point around increasing their internal network&#039;s abilities.  From last summer&#039;s announcement (http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2009/pr_2009_06_08-09_00.html) by Juniper of a 100 Gigabit Ethernet card:

&quot;Verizon is targeting 2010 for commercial deployment of 100G,&quot; said Glenn Wellbrock, director of Optical Transport Network Architecture &amp; Design, Verizon. &quot;The trials conducted in our network to date have focused on proving that our existing optical transmission systems are ready to support 100G. What has been missing so far is a true 100G client-side core router interface, so we are encouraged to see Juniper announcing 100 GE interfaces for its T1600 routers. Given the growth in our FiOS, wireless and IP services, 100G is critical for the core of the network to scale efficiently and simply. By adding 100 GE interfaces to the T1600, Juniper is providing the capability to leverage existing assets to scale the core with maximum operational efficiency.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to guess Frontier isn&#8217;t popping up in Juniper or Cisco or other network vendors&#8217; press releases as a proof point around increasing their internal network&#8217;s abilities.  From last summer&#8217;s announcement (<a href="http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2009/pr_2009_06_08-09_00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2009/pr_2009_06_08-09_00.html</a>) by Juniper of a 100 Gigabit Ethernet card:</p>
<p>&#8220;Verizon is targeting 2010 for commercial deployment of 100G,&#8221; said Glenn Wellbrock, director of Optical Transport Network Architecture &#038; Design, Verizon. &#8220;The trials conducted in our network to date have focused on proving that our existing optical transmission systems are ready to support 100G. What has been missing so far is a true 100G client-side core router interface, so we are encouraged to see Juniper announcing 100 GE interfaces for its T1600 routers. Given the growth in our FiOS, wireless and IP services, 100G is critical for the core of the network to scale efficiently and simply. By adding 100 GE interfaces to the T1600, Juniper is providing the capability to leverage existing assets to scale the core with maximum operational efficiency.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

